WHY 8 AIN’T SO GREAT & WHY IT’S DRIVING THE DAY
October 4, 2016
TOMORROW AT SCOTUS
|The justices will hear their first insider-trading case since 1997 which will test whether someone can be sent to prison for making trades when the insider who provided the tip wasn’t looking to make any money. Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr and Patricia Hurtado report.
BUT WHO CARES
|When the real story driving the day is that the Supreme Court doesn’t seem so supreme with only eight members on the job for the start of the new term.
HURLEY
|“The U.S. Supreme Court opened its new term on Monday in low-key fashion, still down a justice for the foreseeable future because of the Republican-led Senate’s refusal to act on PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA’S nominee to replace late JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA.”
TOTENBERG
|“Still down a justice, Supreme Court term is off to a restrained start…”
BARNES
|“The Supreme Court’s new term begins Monday with the focus not on the court’s docket but on the court itself and a future that will be defined by a presidential election. For the first time in decades, there will only be eight justices, not nine, to begin the new term. Also absent are the kind of big-ticket cases that in recent years have catapulted the Supreme Court to the fore of American civic life.”
TOP ED
|For The Hill, Executive Director of Fix the Court, GABE ROTH, looks abroad for strategies to reform the United States Supreme Court. “Just as these and other nations learned from the experience of the United States in establishing their constitutional and judicial systems, so, too, should our country take a page from those that have successfully ensured their top legal officials do not become a superannuated oligarchy.”
DIVING INTO THE DEEP END
|For CNN, Joan Biskupic reports the Supreme court, like the rest of the country, struggles with race. And this term, the justices are diving head first into a set of “racially charged cases in the explosive context of the criminal justice system.”
WHAT TO WATCH
|ABC’s Audrey Taylor delivers a list of six cases to watch in OT16. One of them being Salman v. United States, the insider trading case that comes before justices Wednesday.
OTHER NEWS
Constitution Check: Why does the Supreme Court refuse to hear some big cases?
Constitution Daily“Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s Supreme Court correspondent, looks at Monday’s denial of a rehearing in the Obama administration’s immigration case and why it could stand out in the court’s history.”
Oklahoma Supreme Court Invalidates Law Restricting Abortion
The Associated PressIn a unanimous opinion handed down Tuesday, the Oklahoma Supreme Court threw out a state law that would put new restrictions on abortion providers.